In a shocking turn of events, boxing professionals are calling out the controversial decision in the recent fight between David Benavidez and David Morrell, with many labeling it a “robbery.” The highly anticipated showdown between the two super middleweights ended with Benavidez being declared the winner by unanimous decision, but many in the boxing community believe that the judges’ verdict was far from accurate, sparking outrage and heated debate among fans and experts alike.

The bout, which took place in Las Vegas, was a fierce and competitive contest, with both fighters exchanging heavy blows from the start. Morrell, the Cuban fighter with an undefeated record, came into the fight as a clear underdog, but his performance was nothing short of spectacular. Throughout the fight, Morrell showcased superior boxing skills, controlling the pace and landing clean, effective punches. Many analysts and boxing insiders believe that Morrell did enough to secure the win, yet the judges scored the fight in favor of Benavidez.

The decision has been met with widespread criticism, with professionals from all corners of the sport calling the verdict unjust. Former champions, commentators, and boxing analysts have taken to social media and public forums to voice their discontent with the decision. “That was a clear robbery,” said one former world champion. “Morrell outboxed Benavidez for most of the fight. It’s baffling that the judges gave it to Benavidez.”

Other analysts pointed to specific rounds where Morrell appeared to dominate, especially with his ability to avoid Benavidez’s power punches while landing clean counters. “Morrell’s defensive movement and his ability to dictate the tempo of the fight were exceptional,” said another prominent boxing commentator. “Benavidez just couldn’t handle the pressure that Morrell was putting on him. It was one of those fights where the underdog really rose to the occasion, and it’s a shame to see a questionable decision rob him of a well-deserved victory.”

Despite the backlash, Benavidez and his camp have defended the decision, with the fighter himself stating that he felt he did enough to win. “I knew I had him hurt at times, and I pushed the action. I took the fight to him,” Benavidez said in a post-fight interview. “I’m happy with the win, and I don’t really pay attention to what the critics say. I know I did my job.”

However, the decision has left a sour taste for many fans who watched the fight. Social media has been flooded with opinions from viewers who were adamant that Morrell was the true winner of the contest. “How do you give that fight to Benavidez? It makes no sense,” one fan tweeted. “Morrell was clearly the better fighter that night.”

The controversy over the decision has brought attention to the issue of scoring in boxing, with many questioning the criteria used by judges to determine the winner. In the aftermath of the fight, many in the boxing world have called for more transparency and accountability in how judges score bouts, especially in high-profile matches like this one.

Despite the controversy, both fighters have expressed respect for one another and their shared desire to continue proving themselves in the ring. Benavidez, who remains undefeated, is now looking ahead to potential big-money fights, while Morrell’s stock has only risen despite the controversial outcome. Many believe that the Cuban boxer’s performance, even in defeat, has proven that he belongs among the elite in the super middleweight division.

The fallout from the fight is likely to linger, with calls for a rematch already circulating. Many believe that a second encounter between Benavidez and Morrell would be a chance to right the wrongs of the first fight and give the fans the fair outcome they deserve.

For now, however, the controversy surrounding the decision continues to dominate the headlines, with fans and experts alike calling for change in how boxing decisions are made. The fight may be over, but the debate is far from finished.